Uncategorized

Man Of Steel

Super cool or super frustrating?

What’s it about?
Henry Cavill plays Superman. He searches for meaning. He fights General Zod.

What did we think?
Anthony Sherratt says: F*** you Snyder.

2 comments on “Man Of Steel

  1. For the first 15 minutes I thought I’d wandered into the new Star Wars movie.
    Man Of Steel has both a poor plot and a lack of respect for the core of the character. It fails in nearly every aspect it sets out to achieve except for one: making money. As an avid Superman fan that would normally make me happy as it means a sequel. But I would rather sit through a decade without a Superman movie than watch a similarly styled second film.
    On the positive side of things Cavill is a great Superman, the casting is great (Costner was very good) and the fight scenes and fx are impressive. In fact the last hour or so is full-on action, but at the end of the day it still lacks a good story and characterisation. And logic or timing.
    It’s actually a good superhero movie but it’s not a Superman film.

  2. I finally got to see this, and couldn’t disagree more. I’m not a Superman comic book reader, I just like good films, and this is a good film.

    What made Man of Steel work for me is the villain: I empathised with Zod. Yes, he’s a psychopathic maniac, but he’s doing it for a good reason.

    Plus it ticks all the comic book movie boxes: It’s action packed, it has plot holes that are big enough for semi-trailers to drive through, and it’s fun fun fun. 4 Stars!

Leave a Reply

Scroll to top